Value Incommensurability

Incommensurability is the impossibility to determine how two options relate to each other in terms of conventional comparative relations. This book features new research on incommensurability from philosophers who have shaped the field into what it is today, including John Broome, Ruth Chang and Wlodek Rabinowicz.

Henrik Andersson is a postdoc at Lund University. His research has had a focus on value theory and especially the phenomenon of value incommensurability. In his current research project, he applies recent results from value theory in order to address the hard choices we face when we aim to combat climate change. Anders Herlitz is a researcher at the Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm. His research focuses on comparability problems and rational choice, especially in relation to distributive theory. He is currently working on a monograph addressing how to distribute scarce health resources.

Introduction Henrik Andersson and Anders Herlitz Part I: Accounts of Incommensurability 1. Incommensurability is Vagueness John Broome 2. Are Hard Cases Vague Cases? Ruth Chang 3. Parity without Imprecise Equality Chrisoula Andreou Part II: Incommensurability and Ethical Theory 4. On "Incommensurability,"Discontinuity," and the Repugnant Conclusion: "Imprecise Equality" or Vagueness? Mozaffar Qizilbash 5. Spectrum Arguments, Indeterminacy, and Value Superiority Henrik Andersson 6. Incommensurability and Vagueness in Population Axiology Gustaf Arrhenius Part III: Incommensurability and Decision Theory 7. Nondeterminacy and Reasonable Choice Anders Herlitz 8. Cross-Categorical Value Comparisons Krister Bykvist 9. What Does Incommensurability Tell Us about Agency? Luke Elson Part IV: Incommensurability, Risk and Uncertainty 10. Incommensurability Meets Risk Wlodek Rabinowicz 11. Incommensurability That Can(not) Be ignored Katie Steele 12. Hard Choices Made Harder Ryan Doody